Philadelphia, July 19, 2022 – Not a day goes by without reports of more tragic incidents of gun violence against children. In 2020, firearms were the leading cause of death in children in the United States. While alarm at increasingly frequent school shootings, suicides, accidents, and other senseless deaths is mounting, the US has not moved forward as a nation to stem this rising tide. An eye-opening analysis by state of US youth firearm mortalities statistics from 2010-2019, which appears in the American Journal of Medicine Open (AJMO) published by Elsevier, provides important clues about how to effectively address these problems.
The findings, which present a sobering picture that validates earlier studies, show that the gun death rates per 100,000 American children increased by 30% during the study period. There were also rate increases among children across several categories, notably suicidal deaths (+63%), females (+46%), Southerners (+52%), non-Hispanic Whites (+45%), and non-Hispanic Blacks (+36%).
This study is one of the few that examines youth firearm mortality rates by state and contributes new insights through this analysis. “The significant differences in the state-by-state data provide an opportunity for states with high mortality rates to evaluate the policies in low mortality states. This comparison has the potential to reduce the trajectory of increasing gun deaths,” noted James H. Price, PhD, MPH, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA, who co-authored the article with Jagdish Khubchandani, MBBS, PhD, Department of Public Health Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.
Most previous studies have looked at the number of deaths across the nation, for a limited period, and may not have assessed differences in deaths by state, region, age, race, or mechanism of deaths (e.g., suicide vs. homicide).
“Our findings were a precursor to what was coming. The recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data report has shown that firearms are now the leading cause of death in children and adolescents. Our findings, published before this new CDC data came out, reflected the growing trends of such mortality in the past decade,” explained Dr. Khubchandani.
The four states that did not have an upward trend in gun violence affecting children were New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and California, and have subsequently been shown to have strong laws to prevent child access to guns. Seven states with the highest rates of increased child-related gun violence (more than a 70% increase) were South Carolina, Arkansas, Colorado, Ohio, Kansas, Texas, and Indiana. Dr. Price stated, “Four of these states do not have child access prevention laws and two have weak laws.” Eighteen states had too few incidents in either 2010 or 2019 to reliably predict a trend.
According to Dr. Price, “The message is clear: States with more guns have more gun homicides, suicides, and unintentional deaths. States with strong laws that limit access have fewer gun deaths. While solutions proposed by most legislators show a lack of knowledge about the research in this area, we hope the leaders of the 26 states with increased firearm mortality will take heed of these findings.”
To address the worsening epidemic of youth suicides, he noted that better access to mental health resources and better storage of firearms by adults is needed.
Most major causes and risk factors for death in children have been declining, except firearms. Given the recent mass school shootings, public attention is currently focused on preventing school-based tragedies. Dr. Khubchandani pointed out that these incidents comprise less than 5% of all child firearm deaths. “More than 10 children die of firearms in communities every day, most taking place away from schools. We must address the problem at a broader level, with a more comprehensive approach to policies, prevention practices, and clinical interventions.”
Looking at deadly shootings involving children from a broader perspective, AJMO Editor-in-Chief Stuart Chipkin, MD, University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Amherst, MA, USA, added, “For a problem this tragic, it would be overly simplistic to think that geography is the only variable to consider. Beyond what states can accomplish, we need to consider possibilities including cooperation between states or national oversight programs. Gun manufacturers can and should be brought to the table to contribute ways to maximize safety. Thinking ‘outside the box’ of state borders will be important to create sustainable reductions in youth mortality. Rather than a map of high and low mortality rates, collaborative approaches should be emphasized as a way to create a map in which pediatric deaths from gun violence are minimal across the country.”
American Journal of Medicine Open
Method of Research
Subject of Research
Epidemiological trends of youth firearm mortality in the U.S. States, 2010-2019
Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.